Clean ASCII Flowcharts: Tips for Readability and LayoutASCII flowcharts are a lightweight, portable way to represent processes in plain text. They’re ideal for README files, terminal documentation, code comments, emails, and any environment where images are inconvenient or unavailable. Done well, ASCII flowcharts communicate structure clearly and look professional; done badly, they become dense, hard-to-follow blocks of characters. This article explains principles, practical tips, and step-by-step techniques to produce clean, readable ASCII flowcharts.
Why use ASCII flowcharts
- Ubiquity: Plain text displays consistently across editors, terminals, and platforms.
- Version control friendly: Diffs are simple, and charts are editable without binary assets.
- Minimal dependencies: No graphics software required; works in constrained environments.
- Searchable and copyable: Text can be searched, copied, or scripted easily.
Principles of readable ASCII flowcharts
-
Clarity over cleverness
- Use simple shapes and lines; avoid decorative complexity.
- Prioritize readable labels and logical flow; visual flourish should not replace clarity.
-
Consistent spacing and alignment
- Align boxes and connectors on a grid (character columns/rows).
- Keep consistent padding inside boxes and consistent gaps between elements.
-
Use simple, distinct shapes for different node types
- Rectangles for processes, diamonds for decisions (use / or angled characters), ovals for start/end.
- Use different line styles (─, │, ═, ║, +) consistently if your environment supports box-drawing characters.
-
Short, descriptive labels
- Keep text lines short (one or two lines per node) to avoid wide boxes.
- Use verbs for actions (e.g., “Validate input”), nouns for data items.
-
Clear connectors and directionality
- Use arrows (→, ↓, ↑, ←) or ASCII equivalents (->, |, v, ^) to show flow direction.
- Avoid crossing lines when possible; when unavoidable, use clear junction markers (+) or gaps.
Choosing characters: plain ASCII vs box-drawing
- Plain ASCII (recommended for maximum portability): use +, -, |, /, , ->
- Example:
+---------+ | Start | +----+----+ | / +---------+ | Process | +---------+
- Example:
- Box-drawing characters (cleaner look if environment supports): use ┌ ┐ └ ┘ ─ │ ├ ┤ ┬ ┴ ╭ ╮ ╯ ╰
- They render nicely in modern terminals and many editors but may break in some fonts or when copied to plain-text-only systems.
Layout strategies
-
Horizontal vs vertical flow
- Vertical flow is most common (top → bottom) and fits narrow text windows.
- Horizontal flow works well when steps are short or when illustrating branching with wide terminals.
-
Use a grid mindset
- Treat each node as occupying a rectangular cell. Map connectors to cell boundaries.
- Plan node widths based on the longest label in that column; align columns to that width.
-
Modularize complex charts
- Break large processes into subcharts; label each subchart and provide a compact index.
- Use “see subchart A” nodes to reduce on-screen clutter.
-
Minimize line crossings
- Re-order nodes to reduce connector intersections.
- Use whitespace intentionally — extra rows/columns can make the flow easier to follow than cramped layouts.
Building blocks and templates
Below are standard ASCII templates for common nodes. Adjust widths to fit your labels.
-
Rectangle (process)
+-------------+ | Process | +-------------+ -
Rounded start/end
( Start )+-------+ | Start | +-------+ -
Decision (diamond — two-line approximation)
/----- / Yes < ? > No / -----/Simpler decision using text:
+-----------+ | Condition?| +-----+-----+ | Yes|No -
Connector/arrow Use -> for horizontal arrows and | with v or ^ for vertical:
[Step A] -> [Step B] | v [Step C]
Examples: small to complex
-
Simple linear flow (vertical)
+------------+ | Start | +-----+------+ | v +------------+ | Initialize | +-----+------+ | v +------------+ | Process | +-----+------+ | v +------------+ | End | +------------+ -
Decision branch
+-----------+ | Start | +-----+-----+ | v +-----------+ | Check X? | +--+-----+--+ | | Yes No | | v v +----+ +----+ |A | |B | +----+ +----+ / / v v +------+ | End | +------+ -
Compact horizontal branch (good for README line-widths)
+-----+ +-----+ +-----+ |Start|-> |Chk |--Y->|A | +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ --N->|B | +-----+
Tips for labels and text
- Use sentence-case or title-case consistently.
- Abbreviate carefully; prefer clarity over saving a few characters.
- For multi-line node labels, center or left-align consistently. Example:
+------------------+ | Validate | | user input | +------------------+
Accessibility and portability
- Test in different fonts and terminals. Some fonts render box-drawing characters properly; others do not.
- Provide a plain-text description beneath big charts for screen readers or copy-paste contexts. Example:
- “Start → Initialize → Check X: if yes go to A, otherwise go to B → End.”
Tools and automation
- Handcrafting is often fine for small charts. For larger flows, consider:
- ASCII diagram generators (various scripts and libraries can convert simple markup to ASCII).
- Diagram-as-code tools that export to text (some can output ASCII art).
- Custom scripts (Python) that layout nodes on a grid and render ASCII or box characters.
Common pitfalls and how to avoid them
- Overly wide nodes: wrap text or split a node into two.
- Crowded connectors: add whitespace or break the chart into subcharts.
- Inconsistent styles: pick one style (plain ASCII or box-drawing) and stick with it.
- Illegible decisions: format condition nodes with explicit Yes/No paths rather than implicit arrows.
Quick checklist before publishing
- Does the flow read top-to-bottom or left-to-right so the direction is obvious?
- Are labels short and consistent?
- Are connectors unambiguous and minimally crossing?
- Does it render acceptably in a monospaced font and a standard terminal?
- Is there a text summary for accessibility?
Clean ASCII flowcharts are a blend of technical discipline and aesthetic judgment. With consistent alignment, clear labels, and an eye for spacing, you can make compact, portable diagrams that communicate processes as effectively as graphical charts — and sometimes more reliably because they’re plain text.